Clear Data Statement
Every research manuscript should include a clear statement explaining where supporting data can be found, or why data cannot be shared.
UnivColl Publications provides these guidelines to help authors prepare clear, ethical and publication-ready data availability statements for journals, books, edited volumes, book chapters, conference proceedings and research communications.
Academic Publisher, Scholarly Publishing House and Open Access Publisher
A data availability statement is a short declaration within a manuscript that explains whether the data supporting the research are available, where they are located, how they can be accessed and why any access restrictions apply. It helps readers, reviewers, editors and future researchers understand the evidence behind the article while respecting ethical, legal and practical limitations.
Every research manuscript should include a clear statement explaining where supporting data can be found, or why data cannot be shared.
Data sharing should support verification and reuse without violating privacy, consent, confidentiality, legal obligations or ethical permissions.
Where appropriate, authors should use a reliable data repository, institutional archive or subject repository that provides a stable link or persistent identifier.
Editors and reviewers may request underlying data, analysis files or documentation when needed to evaluate transparency, reproducibility or publication ethics concerns.
These guidelines apply across the UnivColl Publications scholarly publishing ecosystem. Journal-specific instructions, funder requirements, institutional rules or ethics committee conditions may add further requirements for particular disciplines or article types.
A good data availability statement is specific, truthful, concise and easy to verify. It should avoid vague claims and should not promise access that cannot be provided after publication.
| Element | Guidance | Example Wording |
|---|---|---|
| Data Location | State where the data supporting the article can be accessed: repository, supplementary file, public database, institutional archive, appendix, author-held record or third-party source. | The datasets supporting this study are available in the named repository at the provided DOI or URL. |
| Persistent Identifier | Where available, provide DOI, accession number, permanent URL, handle, archive identifier, dataset version or catalogue number. | Repository name: Dataset title, version, DOI/accession number. |
| Access Conditions | Explain whether the data are open, embargoed, restricted, available on request or unavailable due to legal, ethical, commercial or privacy restrictions. | Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request subject to institutional permission. |
| Ethical and Privacy Limits | For human participants, patients, minors, institutional records or sensitive communities, describe the restriction without revealing confidential information. | Individual-level data cannot be shared publicly because consent did not permit public release. |
| Reuse Information | If possible, mention the data licence, reuse conditions, citation requirement, code availability, documentation and file formats. | The dataset may be reused under the repository licence with citation of the dataset and article. |
| No New Data | For conceptual, theoretical, legal, review or opinion papers where no new data were generated, state this clearly. | No new datasets were generated or analysed during the preparation of this article. |
Authors should select a statement type that honestly reflects the data used in the manuscript.
Use this when the supporting dataset is deposited in a public or institutional repository with a stable link, DOI, accession number or archive record.
Use this when the data are included in the article PDF, HTML page, appendices or downloadable supplementary files hosted by the journal or publisher.
Use this when the analysis relies on data already available from government portals, public databases, archives, libraries or recognized institutional sources.
Use this when the data cannot be released openly because of ethics approval, privacy law, consent limits, confidentiality, institutional restrictions or commercial sensitivity.
Use this only when open sharing is not possible or not appropriate. Authors should state who may be contacted and what conditions may apply.
Use this for theoretical, conceptual, doctrinal, historical, narrative review or commentary manuscripts that do not generate or analyse new datasets.
Authors may adapt these templates according to the actual study, journal instructions, funder rules, ethics approval, repository record and data ownership conditions.
The data supporting the findings of this study are available in [Repository Name] at [DOI/URL/accession number]. The dataset is available under the repository licence and should be cited as [dataset citation].
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary files. Additional clarifications may be requested from the corresponding author where appropriate.
The data supporting this study are not publicly deposited because [brief reason]. De-identified data may be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and subject to institutional, ethical or legal approval.
The data cannot be shared publicly because they contain confidential, sensitive or legally restricted information. Access may be considered only under the conditions approved by the relevant ethics committee or data controller.
This study used third-party data available from [source name] at [URL/identifier]. The authors do not own the data and access is subject to the source provider’s terms and conditions.
No new datasets were generated or analysed during the preparation of this article. The article is based on conceptual analysis, literature review or publicly available information cited in the references.
When data can be shared, authors should prefer stable repositories and identifiers that allow readers to locate the exact record supporting the article. Data citations and repository metadata help preserve research traceability beyond the article PDF.
Transparency does not require authors to expose private, confidential, legally restricted or ethically sensitive information. In such cases, authors should provide a careful restriction statement and, where possible, describe how qualified researchers may seek access under approved conditions.
Do not publicly share identifiable participant, patient, student, employee or respondent data unless consent, ethics approval and law clearly permit such sharing.
Use extra caution for data involving minors, vulnerable groups, protected communities or sensitive social, medical, legal or financial information.
Where data come from an institution, agency, department or administrative record, follow the source authority’s access and confidentiality rules.
If data are owned by a third party or generated under commercial restrictions, state the access limitation and source terms without overstating availability.
The corresponding author should coordinate with all co-authors to ensure that the data statement is accurate, compliant with permissions and consistent with the manuscript record.
Editors may check the statement for clarity, accuracy, ethical protection and consistency with the manuscript. This does not mean every dataset is independently audited in full unless required.
The editorial office may check whether the manuscript includes a data availability statement or whether a no-data statement is appropriate for the article type.
Editors may ask authors to make the statement more specific by adding repository details, access conditions, DOI, accession number, supplementary file description or restriction reason.
Reviewers may evaluate whether the available data, documentation or supplementary files are sufficient to understand and assess the methods, results and conclusions.
For sensitive data, editors may check that the statement protects privacy and follows consent, ethics approval, institutional permission or data controller requirements.
The final article may include the data statement with declarations, supplementary files, data citations or article metadata to support transparency and discoverability.
Use this checklist to avoid unclear data statements, broken links, unsupported access claims and post-publication correction issues.
UnivColl Publications encourages responsible data availability practices that support reader understanding, ethical editorial evaluation, reproducibility where applicable and long-term confidence in the scholarly record.
Data availability statements should improve transparency while protecting participants, institutions and third-party rights. Authors remain responsible for ensuring that data release, repository deposit and supplementary files comply with applicable permissions.
These FAQs help authors, reviewers and editors understand how data statements should be prepared, reviewed and corrected when necessary.
A clear data statement is recommended for research manuscripts. For theoretical, conceptual, narrative or review articles with no new data, authors should state that no new datasets were generated or analysed.
Yes, but it should not be used as a vague substitute for open sharing. Authors should explain why the data are request-based and identify the contact or approval pathway where appropriate.
Do not share identifiable or confidential data publicly unless consent, ethics approval and law allow it. Provide a restricted-data statement explaining the limitation without revealing private information.
Where a dataset, code package, public database or repository record is a citable scholarly object, authors should cite it with creator, title, year, repository, version and persistent identifier where available.
Supplementary files may be suitable for small supporting materials. For larger datasets, reusable research data, code or versioned records, a stable repository is usually more appropriate.
The publisher may request clarification and, if needed, publish a correction, update a link, amend supplementary material or investigate a publication ethics concern.
Guidance for transparent data statements, access limits and research record clarity. Use the related author pages, publisher policies and official support routes below to move through the publication process with clarity, transparency and responsible scholarly practice.