Skip to main content
Academic PublisherOpen Access PublishingPeer-Reviewed JournalsBooks & ProceedingsDOI Prefix: 10.65919
Corrections and Retractions Policy

Corrections, Withdrawals and Retractions Policy

UnivColl Publications is committed to protecting the scholarly record through responsible correction, clarification, withdrawal, expression of concern and retraction processes where required.

Scholarly Record Protection

Published Records Must Remain Accurate, Transparent and Trustworthy

Post-publication issues may arise due to author error, production error, metadata mistake, ethical concern, plagiarism, rights issue, data problem or other serious matter. UnivColl Publications aims to handle such matters carefully and transparently.

This policy applies to journals, books, edited volumes, book chapters, conference proceedings and future academic publishing programs managed by UnivColl Publications.

Record Integrity Desk

  • Publisher UnivColl Publications
  • Email editor@univcollpublications.com
  • Support +91-91159-91159
  • Policy Area Correction, Withdrawal & Retraction
Record Integrity Principles

Principles Behind Post-Publication Record Action

Corrections and retractions should be handled with fairness, documentation, transparency and respect for the scholarly record.

Principle

Scholarly Record Integrity

Corrections, clarifications, withdrawals and retractions should protect the accuracy, reliability and transparency of the publication record.

Principle

Transparent Notice

Where appropriate, a notice may explain the reason for a correction, withdrawal, expression of concern or retraction.

Principle

Fair Assessment

Concerns should be reviewed carefully with attention to available evidence, documentation, author response and editorial judgement.

Principle

Author Communication

Authors may be contacted for clarification, documentation or response when a post-publication issue is identified.

Principle

Reader Protection

Readers should be informed when a published record requires correction, clarification or significant post-publication action.

Principle

Ethical Responsibility

Serious errors, plagiarism, duplicate publication, fabrication or rights violations may require stronger publication record action.

Publication Record Actions

Types of Corrections, Withdrawals and Retractions

Different problems require different publication record actions. The response should match the seriousness and nature of the issue.

Publication Ethics
Record Action

Correction

A correction may be issued when a published work contains an error that should be fixed but does not invalidate the overall scholarly contribution.

Record Action

Clarification

A clarification may be issued when additional explanation is needed to improve reader understanding or publication record accuracy.

Record Action

Expression of Concern

An expression of concern may be considered when a serious issue is under investigation but a final decision has not yet been reached.

Record Action

Withdrawal

A manuscript may be withdrawn before final publication according to policy, author request, editorial decision or ethical concern.

Record Action

Retraction

A retraction may be considered when major errors, misconduct, plagiarism, duplicate publication or unreliable findings are confirmed.

Record Action

Removal in Exceptional Cases

Content removal may be considered only in exceptional cases such as legal risk, privacy violation, serious harm or unlawful material.

Correction Reasons

When a Correction May Be Appropriate

A correction may be used when a publication contains an error but the core scholarly contribution remains reliable and valid.

Author name, affiliation or corresponding author detail correction

Minor factual error that does not change the overall conclusion

Formatting, table, figure, page or metadata correction

Reference, DOI, citation or acknowledgement correction

Funding, conflict of interest or declaration clarification

Typographical or production error introduced during publication

Correction of supplementary file or related publication information

Any issue where the publication remains valid after correction

Serious Record Actions

Retraction and Withdrawal Considerations

Serious publication concerns may require withdrawal before publication or retraction after publication.

Retraction

Possible Retraction Reasons

!

Confirmed plagiarism or substantial unattributed copying

!

Fabricated, falsified or unreliable data

!

Duplicate publication or redundant publication without disclosure

!

Serious ethical approval, consent or research integrity issue

!

Major error that invalidates the findings or scholarly contribution

!

Improper authorship, fraudulent submission or manipulated review concern

!

Copyright or third-party rights violation that cannot be resolved by correction

!

Legal, institutional or ethical concern requiring formal record action

Withdrawal

Possible Withdrawal Reasons

!

Author requests withdrawal before final publication

!

Duplicate submission discovered during editorial processing

!

Author fails to provide required documents, declarations or permissions

!

Serious scope, ethics or originality concern found before publication

!

Manuscript submitted without proper author approval

!

Copyright permission is unavailable or disputed

!

Editorial decision requires termination of processing

!

Other justified reason documented by the editorial office or publisher

Assessment Process

How Correction or Retraction Concerns May Be Handled

Concerns are assessed according to available evidence, documentation, author response, editorial judgement and publication integrity.

Report Concern
01

Concern or Error Identified

An issue may be identified by authors, readers, editors, reviewers, institutions, indexing services or the publisher.

02

Initial Record Check

The publisher or editorial office may check the publication record, manuscript details, author information and available evidence.

03

Author or Editorial Communication

Where appropriate, authors, editors or relevant parties may be contacted for clarification, response or supporting documentation.

04

Policy-Based Assessment

The matter may be assessed according to publication ethics, copyright, peer review, author responsibility and record integrity requirements.

05

Decision on Record Action

The outcome may be no action, correction, clarification, expression of concern, withdrawal, retraction or exceptional removal.

06

Notice and Record Update

Where required, the published record may be updated with a notice, metadata update or clearly linked publication record action.

Responsibilities

Author, Publisher and Reader Responsibilities

Protecting the publication record depends on responsible action by authors, publishers, editors, readers and institutions.

Authors

Author Responsibilities

Notify the publisher promptly if a serious error is found

Provide accurate information and supporting documents when requested

Cooperate in good faith during correction or retraction assessment

Avoid public misrepresentation of the publication record

Disclose duplicate submission, prior publication or related concerns

Provide corrected author details, declarations or permissions where required

Respect editorial and publisher decisions made according to policy

Preserve the accuracy and integrity of the scholarly record

Publisher

Publisher Responsibilities

Receive and assess correction or retraction concerns responsibly

Review available evidence and documentation before record action

Communicate with authors or editors where appropriate

Protect readers from misleading or unreliable publication records

Avoid unnecessary removal when correction or notice is sufficient

Maintain transparency in correction, withdrawal or retraction notices

Respect publication ethics, copyright and legal considerations

Preserve long-term traceability of the scholarly record

Readers

Reader Guidance

Report errors or concerns with complete publication details

Provide supporting evidence where possible

Avoid making unsupported allegations

Mention article title, author name, journal or book title, DOI or URL where available

Use official publisher communication channels

Understand that investigation and editorial assessment may require time

Distinguish between minor errors and serious integrity concerns

Respect the final published notice or record action

Notices and Transparency

Publication Record Notices Should Be Clear and Traceable

Notices help readers understand the current status of a publication record.

Notice

Correction Notice

A correction notice may describe the corrected item and may remain linked to the original published work.

Notice

Retraction Notice

A retraction notice may identify the retracted work and explain the reason for retraction where appropriate.

Notice

Withdrawal Notice

A withdrawal notice may be used where a manuscript or record is removed from processing before final publication.

Notice

Expression of Concern

An expression of concern may alert readers to a serious unresolved issue while assessment continues.

Not Supported

Practices That Damage Publication Record Integrity

UnivColl Publications does not support misuse of correction, withdrawal or retraction processes for misleading, unfair or unethical purposes.

!

Requesting retraction only to avoid criticism without valid reason

!

Using correction requests to manipulate authorship unfairly

!

Making unsupported public allegations without evidence

!

Removing published records silently where a transparent notice is required

!

Ignoring serious plagiarism, data fabrication or ethical concerns

!

Submitting false documents to avoid correction or retraction

!

Claiming that a retracted work remains fully valid without notice

!

Misrepresenting correction, withdrawal or retraction decisions

Important Record Note

Retraction Is Not the Same as Deletion

In many cases, a retracted publication may remain visible with a clear retraction notice so that the scholarly record remains transparent. Silent deletion may reduce traceability and reader understanding.

Responsible Communication

Report Concerns with Evidence and Publication Details

Anyone reporting a correction or retraction concern should provide article title, author name, journal or book title, DOI or URL where available, concern description and supporting evidence.

Corrections and Retractions FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Basic questions about correction, withdrawal, expression of concern, retraction and publication record protection.

What is a correction?

A correction is a post-publication update used when an error is identified but the overall published work remains valid.

What is a retraction?

A retraction is a formal publication record action used when a published work has serious errors, misconduct, plagiarism, duplicate publication or unreliable findings.

Can authors request correction after publication?

Yes. Authors may contact the publisher with complete publication details and supporting information if a correction is required.

Can a manuscript be withdrawn before publication?

A manuscript may be withdrawn before final publication according to policy, author request, editorial decision or ethical concern.

Does retraction remove the article completely?

Not always. In many cases, the record may remain accessible with a clear retraction notice to preserve transparency and scholarly traceability.

How can readers report a concern?

Readers may contact UnivColl Publications with publication title, author details, DOI or URL where available, concern description and supporting evidence.

Policy Pathway

Related Policies, Author Actions and Trust Pages

This policy is connected with UnivColl Publications' wider publishing ecosystem, including author guidance, editorial independence, publication ethics, metadata readiness and official support routes. Use the related links to move to the next practical step without relying on disconnected or informal information.

Transparency and Responsible Publishing

Policy Use Does Not Create Publication or Indexing Guarantees

UnivColl Publications uses policy pages to support transparent communication, fair editorial handling, author awareness and scholarly record integrity. Submission, payment, policy compliance or support communication must not be treated as a promise of acceptance, indexing, citation, ranking or any third-party database outcome.

Ethics

Publication Ethics

Editorial and publication decisions should remain evidence-based, policy-led and independent.

No False Promise

No Guaranteed Acceptance

Acceptance depends on scope, originality, review suitability, ethical compliance and editorial decision.

Metadata

Metadata Ready

Published records may be supported with structured metadata, DOI references and correction workflows where applicable.

Support

Documented Support

Queries should include manuscript ID, DOI, transaction reference or policy concern details where available.

COPE Guidance DOI Resolver ORCID Creative Commons
fIGXinWATG
Contact Us