Responsible Request
A withdrawal request should be genuine, clearly explained and submitted by the corresponding author or authorized author representative.
UnivColl Publications handles manuscript withdrawal requests through a responsible, documented and policy-based process that protects authors, editors, reviewers and the scholarly publication record.
A manuscript withdrawal request may be considered when authors identify a genuine issue before publication. Withdrawal should not be used to avoid ethical review, duplicate submission consequences, reviewer comments or editorial decision.
This policy applies to journals, books, edited volumes, book chapters, conference proceedings and future academic publishing programs managed by UnivColl Publications.
Withdrawal handling should remain fair, transparent, documented and aligned with publication ethics and editorial workflow.
A withdrawal request should be genuine, clearly explained and submitted by the corresponding author or authorized author representative.
Authors remain responsible for the submission, originality, co-author approval and accuracy of all information provided.
Withdrawal should not be used to avoid ethical review, plagiarism assessment, editorial decision or publication record responsibility.
Authors should not withdraw a manuscript merely to publish elsewhere after parallel submission or acceptance without proper disclosure.
All withdrawal communication should include Paper ID, manuscript title, author email and clear reason for withdrawal.
Withdrawal requests may be reviewed according to processing stage, editorial work completed, ethical concerns and publication status.
A withdrawal request is easier to process at an early stage and becomes more serious after review, acceptance, production or publication.
A withdrawal request made soon after submission may be easier to process if no editorial or review work has begun.
If screening has started, the request may be reviewed with submission records and basic editorial processing status.
If reviewers or editors have already invested time, withdrawal may require clear reason and editorial acknowledgement.
Withdrawal after acceptance is more serious and may require strong justification, author confirmation and publisher review.
Once production, formatting, DOI processing or publication preparation has started, withdrawal may not be automatically permitted.
After publication, withdrawal is generally not the correct route; correction, retraction or other record action may apply.
Withdrawal may be considered when a genuine, documented and timely reason is provided before publication.
Serious author error discovered before publication
Duplicate submission made by mistake and disclosed promptly
Incorrect author details requiring withdrawal and resubmission
Missing co-author consent identified before processing advances
Ethical approval, permission or copyright issue discovered before publication
Major data, figure, table or reference issue that cannot be corrected quickly
Institutional or supervisor instruction supported by proper documentation
Other genuine reason accepted by the editorial office or publisher
Withdrawal requests may be questioned when they appear connected with duplicate submission, unethical publishing practice, avoidance of review comments or misleading author conduct.
Submitting the same manuscript to another journal at the same time
Withdrawing only because another publisher promised faster publication
Avoiding plagiarism, duplicate submission or ethical investigation
Withdrawing after acceptance without strong reason
Ignoring co-author approval or corresponding author responsibility
Requesting withdrawal after publication as a substitute for retraction
Pressuring editors or reviewers through repeated withdrawal threats
Providing false or misleading reason for withdrawal
Incomplete withdrawal requests may delay processing. Authors should provide complete and accurate submission information.
Withdrawal requests are assessed according to submission record, processing stage, author confirmation and publication ethics.
The corresponding author sends a withdrawal request with Paper ID, title, author email and reason through official communication channels.
The publisher or editorial office checks the submission record, processing stage, editorial status and available documentation.
Where required, the author may be asked to confirm co-author consent, reason for withdrawal and authenticity of the request.
The editorial office may review whether screening, peer review, acceptance, production or ethical assessment has already started.
The publisher may acknowledge withdrawal, request clarification, refuse improper withdrawal or take another policy-based action.
If accepted, the submission record may be updated as withdrawn or closed according to the publication workflow.
A responsible withdrawal process protects author rights, editorial effort, reviewer time and publication ethics.
Read author guidelines before submission
Submit only when all authors have approved the manuscript
Avoid duplicate submission to multiple journals or publishers
Request withdrawal promptly if a genuine issue is discovered
Use official email and provide Paper ID in every communication
Provide truthful reason and supporting documents where required
Do not submit the withdrawn manuscript elsewhere until withdrawal is acknowledged where applicable
Respect publisher and editorial decisions made according to policy
Receive withdrawal requests through official communication channels
Check submission record and processing stage
Maintain fairness and transparency in withdrawal handling
Protect editorial and reviewer time from misuse
Consider ethical, copyright, plagiarism or duplicate submission concerns
Communicate withdrawal acknowledgement or decision where appropriate
Maintain internal record of withdrawal request and decision
Protect the scholarly record from misleading or improper withdrawal practice
Some withdrawal requests may involve ethics, copyright, authorship, duplicate submission or publication record concerns.
If duplicate submission is discovered, the publisher may treat the case as a publication ethics concern, not merely a normal withdrawal.
Withdrawal after acceptance may require detailed justification because editorial and review work may already be completed.
After publication, the appropriate route may be correction, clarification, expression of concern or retraction rather than withdrawal.
Withdrawal request may not stop an ongoing investigation into plagiarism, authorship dispute, data concern or other misconduct.
Where authorship or consent is disputed, the publisher may request written confirmation from relevant authors or institutions.
If DOI processing, metadata preparation, page proof, formatting or production work has begun, withdrawal may require additional review.
Most withdrawal issues can be avoided when authors prepare carefully, obtain co-author approval and submit only to one publisher at a time.
Submit only final and approved manuscripts
Discuss submission and target journal with all co-authors first
Do not submit the same manuscript to multiple publishers
Keep Paper ID and submission acknowledgement safely
Contact the editorial office early if a genuine issue arises
Respond to clarification requests promptly
Maintain professional communication with editors and publisher
Use withdrawal only for genuine and documented reasons
UnivColl Publications does not support misuse of withdrawal requests, duplicate submission, false reasons, pressure tactics or withdrawal to escape ethical responsibility.
Parallel submission followed by withdrawal after acceptance elsewhere
False withdrawal reason
Withdrawal to avoid plagiarism or ethics review
Withdrawal after acceptance without valid explanation
Repeated pressure messages to force immediate withdrawal
Submitting without co-author consent and later requesting withdrawal
Treating post-publication removal as normal withdrawal
Misrepresenting withdrawal status to another journal or publisher
If plagiarism, duplicate submission, copyright violation, fabricated data or authorship dispute is involved, the publisher may treat the matter as an ethics concern even if a withdrawal request is submitted.
A proper withdrawal request should include Paper ID, manuscript title, corresponding author email, clear reason and confirmation that all authors agree to the request.
Basic questions about manuscript withdrawal, author request, duplicate submission, acceptance stage and post-publication record action.
Authors may request withdrawal with Paper ID, manuscript title, author email, clear reason and author confirmation. The request may be reviewed according to processing stage and policy.
Normally, the corresponding author should send the withdrawal request through the official email used during submission.
Withdrawal after acceptance is more serious and may require strong justification because editorial, review or production work may already be completed.
Not necessarily. If plagiarism, duplicate submission or another ethical concern is involved, the publisher may continue assessment according to publication ethics.
After publication, withdrawal is generally not the normal route. Correction, clarification, expression of concern or retraction may apply depending on the issue.
A withdrawal request should include Paper ID, manuscript title, author name, author email, reason for withdrawal and confirmation that all authors agree.
This policy is connected with UnivColl Publications' wider publishing ecosystem, including author guidance, editorial independence, publication ethics, metadata readiness and official support routes. Use the related links to move to the next practical step without relying on disconnected or informal information.
UnivColl Publications uses policy pages to support transparent communication, fair editorial handling, author awareness and scholarly record integrity. Submission, payment, policy compliance or support communication must not be treated as a promise of acceptance, indexing, citation, ranking or any third-party database outcome.
Editorial and publication decisions should remain evidence-based, policy-led and independent.
Acceptance depends on scope, originality, review suitability, ethical compliance and editorial decision.
Published records may be supported with structured metadata, DOI references and correction workflows where applicable.
Queries should include manuscript ID, DOI, transaction reference or policy concern details where available.